Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3: specs and benchmarks (2024)

Derek12 February 2024 19:31

So, its performance is equivalent to that of Dimensity 8050, right?

+173Reply

Zero21 March 2024 15:42

It is on par with Dimensity 8100, which is really good.

+3Reply

Anonim08 January 2024 22:53

Many people are unaware that the 7 and 7+ series are not identical. I've seen comments stating that the 7 Gen 3 is not the successor to the 7+ Gen 2. However, Qualcomm states that the 7 Gen 3 is indeed the successor to the 7 Gen 1. Furthermore, Qualcomm is set to release the 7+ Gen 3, which will be the successor to the 7+ Gen 2. I hope this clarifies any misconception.

+48Reply

No the 7 gen 3 is not the successor to the 7 gen 103 February 2024 07:27

The sd 7 gen 3 is the same makeup as the 8 gen 3. It's performance core and other cores set up slightly different. But it's performance is remarkable and mocks the 8 gen 3 and if they can do that while knock down cost. Well hell. I'm all for it.

+26Reply

James03 December 2023 15:02

No, it's happening again. Now, Qualcomm is producing subpar processors and MediaTek has released a chipset, the MediaTek 8300, that could disrupt the market. So, Qualcomm will have to create a chipset that rivals MediaTek. I predict a Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 that might perform equally or slightly worse than Gen 2.

+53Reply

Masked30 November 2023 12:10

Even if it's slower than the 7+ Gen 2, it's faster than any other 700 series chip, besides the +Gen 2. If devices that use this chip sell at a cheaper price, then it's a good deal. The performance of the 778G was on par with, if not better than, the Snapdragon 855. I hope the 7Gen 3 can offer performance similar to, or better than, the Snapdragon 865.

+13Reply

not a guy27 November 2023 16:00

Ignore all positive comments. Both the 7th Gen 2 and 7th Gen 3 are weaker than the 7+ Gen 2. Furthermore, the 7+ Gen 2 is more powerful than many other chipsets. 😂

+25Reply

Masked30 November 2023 11:52

Certainly, it's weaker, of course. It even uses a weaker GPU. It's supposed to be weaker since these are mid-range SoCs, unlike the 7+ gen 2 which was a downclocked 8+ gen 1. Devices with this SoC will sell at cheaper prices than the ones with 7+ gen 2.

+6Reply

Zero06 December 2023 17:17

Masked, Supposedly, the facts say otherwise. They have the 6 series for a low price.

+2Reply

Zero11 December 2023 13:35

Masked, Issue? The SD 7 Gen 3 is still expensive, and it is likely that the more affordable SD6 Gen 2 with Samsung fab will cover that gap.

+1Reply

Nathan williams03 February 2024 07:34

Masked, Love your comment. He knows his Snapdragon chipsets and stuff. And he's absolutely right 7+ gen 2 was an underclocked version of 8+ gen 1.... and now with the sd 7 gen 3 being the exact same as the sd 8 gen 3 in terms of all cores present in the 8 gen 3 are present in 7 gen 3 but there will be downclocking , underclocking or less power given. Whatever you wanna call it. It's just simply put they'll just run on different frequencies than the 8 gen 3. But have almost identical performance

+3Reply

Deliond09 February 2024 22:27

Masked, Wouldn't it be nice to consider that the next flagship mid-range CPU, competing against the Dimensity 8300, will be a downclocked version of the 8 Gen 2, labeled 7+ Gen 3?

0Reply

...24 February 2024 06:28

Deliond, The 7+ Gen 3 will be a streamlined version of the 8 Gen 3, boasting a CPU stronger than the 8 Gen 2 (likely comparable to the performance of the A17 Pro). However, it will come with a GPU weaker than the 8 Gen 2, its performance possibly similar to the 8300 Ultra.

0Reply

Miles26 November 2023 13:10

So according to some Antutu tests, it is nearly as powerful as the Snapdragon 888 in GPU power (faster than the 870 graphics). CPU is a match for the 888, consuming half the power. It's pretty good stuff if you ask me. I've seen the Honor 100 running Genshin and Honkai like a champion with this SoC. For midrange, it will be plenty of power and way better than 695, 778, and its variants and even the recently announced 7s Gen 2 which is just a reskinned 6 Gen 1. Hope it gets widely distributed in 2024.People need to get over the 7+ Gen 2. At least get over about wanting it to be on more cheap phones like the F5. POCO does it with their compromises, but for other manufacturers, it is bad business. The chip is too good for their interests, and having it more widespread would keep their flagship market segments alive. That is why after almost a year we only saw two phones with it and they were released basically at the start when it was announced. Sad stuff because it is amazing, but too good to be true.

+13Reply

Zero06 December 2023 17:18

Sorry, but that is a excuse. Mediatek released the Dimensity 8300 and it trashes hard that 7 Gen 3Even more, I predict that Dimensity 7300 will cause even more damage to Qualcomm than expected.

+24Reply

Jerem0607 December 2023 11:36

Zero, You seem to be mixing up the range 7 and 7+. Qualcomm is about to launch Snapdragon 7+ gen 3, which will be as powerful as the Dimensity 8300.

+1Reply

Zero11 December 2023 13:36

Jerem06, The 7+ Gen3 is anticipated to be as fast as the 7+ Gen2 but at a more affordable cost. That's it. This, of course, hinges on whether MTK decides not to reuse the 8300 for the 8400 model, in which case they might just increase the clock speed or add more GPU cores.

0Reply

Joe25 November 2023 15:53

Redmi Note 12 Turbo and Poco F5 are essentially the same phone.

0Reply

imran24 November 2023 07:48

It's an ARM V9 instruction set. Please correct these types of mistakes.

+6Reply

Jerem0622 November 2023 14:52

No support for AV1 and VVC format for SoCs that will be sold in 2024?!

+4Reply

Z9user22 November 2023 12:08

Hahaha, it's so funny. Why is the 7th generation so much better? Maybe we should take it easy in the smartphone world for now...

0Reply

Sawyiier19 November 2023 18:40

Firstly, the 7s Gen 2 should not be faster than the 7+ Gen 2. But now, there is another model that's even weaker than both of them. It seems like Qualcomm made a big mistake when they released and named a flagship chip as a midrange one, with a midrange price to match. The 7+ Gen 2 is faster and more efficient than most chips on the market.It almost seems as though Qualcomm wasn't thinking clearly when they released this range.

+21Reply

Zero27 November 2023 20:35

Was so desperate to defeat the Dimensity 8000 series that released something so powerful that is limited.

+4Reply

Deliond25 March 2024 18:59

Zero, If the 7+ Gen 3 manages to outshine the 8300 and then the 8400 comes out at a competitive price, the 7+ Gen 4 will eventually follow, aiming to outperform it. The cycle will continue like this. MediaTek has become a substantial rival, forcing Qualcomm to release better SoCs. In my opinion, MediaTek and Snapdragon are likely to outdo each other. This competition benefits the consumers of either of these two SoCs. Personally, I don't mind.

+1Reply

Xvkq18 November 2023 19:12

As per HONOR 100 leaks, geekbench is 1140 and 3375 respectively.

+5Reply

Serhii19 November 2023 10:23

Thank you for a useful info.

+4Reply

Xston18 November 2023 13:48

Qualcomm realized they compromised their own flagships with 7+ Gen 2, as it was only used in two devices. Now, they're launching these significantly weaker 7 series chipsets in comparison to the 7+ Gen 2. The company is trying to make us forget the 7+.

+15Reply

Unn22 November 2023 13:11

Three devices utilize the 7+Gen2, they are the Redmi Note 12 Turbo, Poco F5, and Realme GT Neo 5 SE.

+3Reply

Zero27 November 2023 20:39

Well, they made a mistake that the chip is weaker than the Dimensity 8200.... when Mediatek is releasing the 8300, making the situation unsustainable.

0Reply

Geek05 January 2024 21:46

Unn, Poco F5 is rebranded Redmi Note 12 Turbo, they both are one and same, just different name.

0Reply